When writing Her Saving Grace, I was prepared for a backlash
from the historical puritans (which so far, hasn’t come) but it might surprise
many people to know that the science loving, polymath, Damaris Wellesley, is based on real people.
Now when we think women and science, especially the origins
of women in science, we perhaps think of Marie Curie, or she would at least be
high on our list, but while she was the first woman to win a Nobel Prize, she
was far from the first female scientist.
Science didn’t begin as we know it today with structure and
form, overseen by teachers, conducting experiments that thousands have done
before and if one wishes to pursue a career in science, getting a job working
for a profit company, or working for a university and applying for research
grants.
Granted, many scientists did teach at universities, but just
as many if not more, did not. Science was, to my modern understanding, more
what might be considered a hobby. Wealthy men with money, no profession, time
and curiosity, set up rooms or laboratories and thought about stuff, then set
about devising ways to prove the conclusions that had come to. They dabbled in
science, almost. The gifted could also be supported by scientific institutions
or wealthy patrons, although they were most certainly middle class, or raised
and educated by a charitable institution.
There were science journals, where people could publish papers
to be read by like-minded people, but they were few and far between. Many scientists also preferred to
publish books of their works and theories although unlike today, it wasn’t a
for profit venture. In the Victorian age, publishing began to become a for
profit business but until then, people financed their own print runs (or found
a patron to back them) and were as likely to lose money as make it.
Émilie duChâtelet, mathematician & physicist
|
Anyway, under those circumstances, it was actually easier
for women to study science than in later periods, when entrance to universities
and science organisations was banned.
Rich women didn’t have to keep house and raise their own
children so providing they had an understanding husband, lover or father, they
could study science just as easily as a man, although I will admit that they were
less likely to be taken seriously by many men.
Also unlike today, science was viewed more as a collective,
so rather than focusing ones efforts only on one field of research and perhaps
a few related areas, many studied various fields, such as Mary Somerville who began studying algebra and mathematics but also
wrote papers on magnetism, physics, astronomy and chemistry, as well as
translating the work of others into English.
The character of Damaris is based largely on that
understanding, with her sharp mind and a broad range of knowledge, from
philosophy to anatomy.
I had to make her older in order to give her the age
necessary to have amassed all this knowledge, but she could not be infallible
however, so I also gave her one large deficiency, her personality.
Today we might wonder if Damaris was on the autism spectrum,
perhaps with a mild form, such as Asperger’s syndrome, but I didn’t want that
to become the focus of the story.
Her personality is largely based on my own personality, and she is
perhaps my most autobiographical character to date.
When I was a child, I was told by a parent that they suspected
I was autistic and had a personality disorder, I am happy to reveal that I am
not autistic nor do I have a personality disorder (believe me, those thoughts
haunted me for years). I was also constantly likened to a person who was constantly
reviled by my family. This was sometimes done in anger, “You’re so much like X!”
while at other times I think it was just a general musing, and “Doesn’t she
look like X when she does that?”
However, whether cruel or just thoughtless, the actions of a
parent can have a big impact on how we view ourselves, and present ourselves to
the world, which is where I believe Damaris’s behaviour stems from.
While I don’t consider myself a polymath, I do consider
myself intelligent and dare I say it, of above average intelligence. My school
even tested me and I am almost a genius, just 2 points shy of the 140 necessary
to be called one.
It’s hard for me to say that though, as I expect people to
point and laugh. You see, as you probably know if you read this blog, I also
grew up dyslexic and undiagnosed and if that wasn’t enough, I’m also very shy
and a terrible introvert. Did rejection cause the shyness and introversion? It’s
impossible to say but regardless, they are permanent character traits now.
Margaret Cavendish's was criticised by her contemporaries |
As such, I tend to avoid people, even those I love when
upset or depressed. I question things others take for granted and unless I can
see a point in them, I shun societal norms, (I never fit in anyway, so why try?).
My shyness also manifested as passive aggressive, meaning that I often snapped
at people and was rude, although when angry was really the only time when I could
stand up for myself.
I’ve come a long way since then however, I’m assertive
rather than passive aggressive now, I’m confident in my abilities even if I don’t
brag about them, and I am largely comfortable with my deficiencies.
Damaris is a female with above average intelligence, yet largely
derided and dismissed because of her sex, made to feel inferior and excluded by
those around her who either couldn’t, or didn’t want to understand that she was
capable of more than just being pretty.
Poor Damaris is just beginning the journey that I have been
on for over 8 years now, and while she is brusque, thoughtless and rude at
times, I hope I have imbued her with enough humanity to still be a likeable
character.
In my next post, I will be looking at some of the female
scientists who helped shape Damaris’ learnings, if not her personality.
__________________
Her Saving Grace is available in kindle format on Amazon US, Amazon UK and Amazon CA
or
You can read an excerpt here.
No comments:
Post a Comment